From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Triolo v. Touchton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 31, 1988
522 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1720.

March 31, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frank N. Kaney, J.

Randy Hillman, Orlando, for appellants.

Raymond A. McLeod of McLeod, McLeod McLeod, P.A., Apopka, for appellees.


Except as modified herein, we affirm the final order granting specific performance and requiring appellants to convey to appellees the time share interest involved herein but we strike from the judgment that portion thereof which requires the appellees to withhold from the payment due appellants 10% of the purchase price, which sum the trial court concluded was due to Resort Condominium Resales, Inc. (Resort) as a sales commission. Resort is not a party to this action and the trial court had no jurisdiction to determine its rights just as it could not determine its obligations, if any, to the appellants.

AFFIRMED as modified.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Triolo v. Touchton

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Mar 31, 1988
522 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Triolo v. Touchton

Case Details

Full title:MARIO TRIOLO, ET UX., APPELLANTS, v. JAMES W. TOUCHTON, ET UX., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 31, 1988

Citations

522 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)