Trigg v. Wiginton

Full title: JAVARY TREYMAYNE TRIGG, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY WIGINTON, ET AL., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1962-B-BN (N.D. Tex. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-CV-1962-B-BN

01-18-2013

JAVARY TREYMAYNE TRIGG, Plaintiff, v. FREDDY WIGINTON, ET AL., Defendants.

JANE J. BOYLE

ORDER ACCEPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation (doc. 81) on Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 69). Both parties have failed to object to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation within fourteen days as proscribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the Magistrate Judge's finding and recommendations for clear error. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), Advisory Committee Notes, 1983 addition ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.").

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are correct and free of clear error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. 81) are ACCEPTED.

Accordingly, Defendants' Second Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 69) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

____________________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE