From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trificana v. Vickers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

543.3 CA 17–01393

08-22-2019

Richard TRIFICANA and Martha Trificana, Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants, v. DAVID L. VICKERS & SONS and David L. Vickers, Individually, Defendants–Appellants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 3.)

SAUNDERS KAHLER, LLP, UTICA (MERRITT S. LOCKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS–RESPONDENTS. BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.


SAUNDERS KAHLER, LLP, UTICA (MERRITT S. LOCKE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS–APPELLANTS–RESPONDENTS.

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously vacated and the order entered December 10, 2015 is modified on the law by granting that part of the motion of defendants David L. Vickers & Sons and David L. Vickers, individually, for summary judgment dismissing the negligence cause of action and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Sestito v. David L. Vickers & Sons ( [Appeal No. 2] ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d –––– [Aug. 22, 2019] [4th Dept. 2019] ).


Summaries of

Trificana v. Vickers

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Aug 22, 2019
175 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Trificana v. Vickers

Case Details

Full title:Richard TRIFICANA and Martha Trificana, Plaintiffs–Respondents–Appellants…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 22, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
105 N.Y.S.3d 329