Opinion
No. 917 CA 22-01728
02-09-2024
PAUL TRIEST, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. NIXON EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
SEGAR & SCIORTINO PLLC, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN A. SEGAR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (ROBERT E. SCOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
SEGAR & SCIORTINO PLLC, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN A. SEGAR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (ROBERT E. SCOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CURRAN, OGDEN, GREENWOOD, AND NOWAK, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (Frederick G. Reed, A.J.), entered September 27, 2022. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Triest v Nixon Equip. Servs., Inc. ([appeal No. 2] ___ A.D.3d ___ [Feb. 9, 2024] [4th Dept 2024]).