From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Triboro Pharmacy Inc. v. Singh

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 18, 2018
60 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

570205/18

06-18-2018

TRIBORO PHARMACY INC., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Bikram SINGH, Esq., Defendant–Respondent.


Per Curiam.

Judgment (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about January 9, 2018, affirmed, without costs.

The record and ends of "substantial justice" ( CCA 1807 ) support the dismissal, after trial, of this small claims action. Plaintiff failed to establish that it was entitled to a further refund of the fees previously paid to defendant-attorney in connection with legal services defendant was hired to perform. Defendant's testimony, credited by the court, established the number and reasonableness of the hours he expended on plaintiff's behalf. We note that defendant had already voluntarily refunded more than one-third of the legal fees paid by plaintiff.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Triboro Pharmacy Inc. v. Singh

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Jun 18, 2018
60 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

Triboro Pharmacy Inc. v. Singh

Case Details

Full title:Triboro Pharmacy Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bikram Singh, Esq.…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Jun 18, 2018

Citations

60 Misc. 3d 127 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 50917
109 N.Y.S.3d 555