Tribby v. Mattson

Full title: DENNIS DEWAYNE TRIBBY and LINDA LAVINNA TRIBBY, Plaintiffs, v. BUZ MATTSON…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Dec 4, 2007

Civ. No. 07-6187-TC (D. Or. Dec. 4, 2007)

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-6187-TC.

December 4, 2007

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on November 6, 2007. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Plaintiffs have timely filed objections. I have, therefore, given the file of this case a de novo review. I ADOPT the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation (doc. 11) that plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (doc. 9) be denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.