From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Triana v. Syracuse City School District

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 14, 2010
5:10-CV-691 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2010)

Opinion

5:10-CV-691.

October 14, 2010

FREDDY TRIANA, Plaintiff, Pro Se, Syracuse, NY.

CHARLES E. SYMONS, ESQ., FERRARA, FIORENZA, LARRISON, BARRETT REITZ, P.C., Attorneys for Defendants, East Syracuse, NY.


ORDER


Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 15, 2010, on the basis of race and national origin discrimination in violation of Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. (Docket No. 1). Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 56. (Docket No. 8). Plaintiff opposed. (Docket No. 12). Defendants replied. (Docket No. 15).

Plaintiff admits that he did not comply with the conditions precedent required to commence a Title VII claim. He has also failed to assert any facts that he was prevented from, or mislead by the defendants, from exercising his legal rights. Thus, his Title VII action is untimely. Plaintiff's assertion of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to avoid dismissal is unavailing.

Therefore, it is

ORDERED, that the complaint is DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 14, 2010

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Triana v. Syracuse City School District

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Oct 14, 2010
5:10-CV-691 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Triana v. Syracuse City School District

Case Details

Full title:FREDDY TRIANA, Plaintiff, v. SYRACUSE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT; and BRIAN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

5:10-CV-691 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2010)