Triad Mechanical, Inc. v. Coatings Unlimited, Inc.

Full title: TRIAD MECHANICAL, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. COATINGS…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Civil Case No. 07-516-HU (D. Or. Sep. 12, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 07-516-HU.

September 12, 2007

Michael E. Farnell, Spencer S. Adams, Parsons Farnell Green, LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Gary U. Scharff, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Defendant.

Richard A. Lee, Bodyfelt Mount Stroup Chamberlain LLP, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Garnishee.

ORDER

GARR KING, District Judge

The Honorable Dennis Hubel, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on July 10, 2007. The matter is before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Garnishee Royal Surplus Lines Insurance Co. has filed objections, and plaintiff Triad Mechanical, Inc. has filed a response.

When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate's report.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).

Having given a de novo review of the issues raised in the objections to the Findings and Recommendation, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Hubel's Findings and Recommendation (#11) and I GRANT plaintiff's Motion to Remand (#3).