From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Aug 21, 1985
475 So. 2d 877 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985)

Opinion

Civ. 4727.

August 21, 1985.

Roger H. Bedford, Jr. of Bedford, Bedford Rogers, Russellville, for appellants.

Dennis N. Odem, Florence, for appellees.


The plaintiffs' Rule 59, A.R.Civ.P., motion was overruled by operation of Rule 59.1, and more than forty-two days thereafter having expired before the plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal, we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal and are left with no alternative but to dismiss it ex mero motu. Rule 2 (a)(1), A.R.A.P.; State v. Wall, 348 So.2d 482 (Ala. 1977); Haynes v. Haynes, 470 So.2d 1274 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985); Olson v. Olson, 367 So.2d 504 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979).

The foregoing opinion was prepared by retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10 (e) of the Code of Alabama 1975, and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Aug 21, 1985
475 So. 2d 877 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985)
Case details for

Tri-State Auto Auction v. Crouch

Case Details

Full title:TRI-STATE AUTO AUCTION and Georgia Casualty and Surety Company v. Ronald…

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Aug 21, 1985

Citations

475 So. 2d 877 (Ala. Civ. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Scheilz v. Scheilz

The second agreement was filed well after the 90-day period had run. The time for appeal expired on July 25,…

GOLD KIST, INC. v. GRIFFIN

Its notice of appeal, filed in April 1994, was untimely and did not invoke the jurisdiction of this court.…