Opinion
December 15, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.).
The complaint in this action for interference with prospective contractual relations was properly dismissed for failure to allege any dishonest or unlawful means (see, Harden, S.P.A. v Commodore Elecs., 90 A.D.2d 733, 734). This basic deficiency was not cured by plaintiff's proposed amendment, which relates only to a change in the form of plaintiff's business organization from a corporation to a partnership. Thus leave to amend was properly denied (East Asiatic Co. v Corash, 34 A.D.2d 432).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.