From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trez Capital (Fla.) Corp. v. Noroton Heights & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 18, 2022
20cv9622 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

20cv9622 (DLC)

10-18-2022

TREZ CAPITAL (FLORIDA) CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NOROTON HEIGHTS & COMPANY, LLC, Defendant. NOROTON HEIGHTS & COMPANY, LLC, Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. TREZ CAPITAL (FLORIDA) CORPORATION, Counterclaim Defendant.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, DISTRICT JUDGE

On October 17, 2022, the plaintiff filed a reply memorandum of law (the "Reply Memorandum") in support of its motion in limine to preclude the defendant from relying on certain documents produced after July 2, 2020. The filing is not publicly viewable on ECF and is instead designated for selected parties. Plaintiff has not filed a public version of the document, nor has it filed a letter requesting approval of a sealed or redacted version of the memorandum. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that, should plaintiff wish to file a sealed or redacted version of the Reply Memorandum, plaintiff shall file a letter motion no longer than two (2) pages seeking approval to do so. As explained in greater detail in this Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the letter shall be filed in public view and shall explain the reasons for seeking to file a sealed or redacted copy. If the initial filing was in error, plaintiff shall refile the Reply Memorandum as a publicly viewable filing on ECF.

o


Summaries of

Trez Capital (Fla.) Corp. v. Noroton Heights & Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 18, 2022
20cv9622 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Trez Capital (Fla.) Corp. v. Noroton Heights & Co.

Case Details

Full title:TREZ CAPITAL (FLORIDA) CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. NOROTON HEIGHTS …

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

20cv9622 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2022)