From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Treyvone C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2014
115 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-21

In the Matter of TREYVONE C. Oneida County Department of Social Services, Petitioner–Respondent; Shameel P., Respondent–Appellant.

Paul M. Deep, Utica, for Respondent–Appellant. John A. Herbowy, Utica, for Petitioner–Respondent.



Paul M. Deep, Utica, for Respondent–Appellant. John A. Herbowy, Utica, for Petitioner–Respondent.
John G. Koslosky, Attorney for the Child, Utica.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, and SCONIERS, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Respondent mother appeals from an order granting the petition alleging that she violated the terms of a suspended judgment and terminating her parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect. The record belies the mother's contention that Family Court failed to consider whether termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the child, and we agree with the court that termination was in the child's best interests ( see Matter of Ronald O., 43 A.D.3d 1351, 1352, 842 N.Y.S.2d 801;Matter of Saboor C., 303 A.D.2d 1022, 1023, 757 N.Y.S.2d 192). Finally, we note that petitioner's contention that we should vacate that part of the order granting the mother access to posttermination photographs of the child is not properly before us inasmuch as petitioner did not cross-appeal from the order ( see Matter of Cayden L.R. [Melissa R.], 108 A.D.3d 1154, 1156, 969 N.Y.S.2d 674).

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

In re Treyvone C.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 21, 2014
115 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Treyvone C.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TREYVONE C. Oneida County Department of Social Services…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 21, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 1246 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1928
982 N.Y.S.2d 646

Citing Cases

Timothy M.M. v. Doreen R.

We therefore modify the amended order accordingly. Finally, because the mother did not cross-appeal from that…