Opinion
Case No. C04-1590L.
February 6, 2006
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN LIMINE
This matter comes before the Court on "Defendants' Motion in Limine re: CPS Investigator Testimony." Dkt. # 54. Having reviewed the memoranda, declarations, and exhibits submitted by the parties, the Court finds as follows:
(1) Plaintiff does not object to the testimony of Dan Knadle regarding the fact that the Monroe Police Department requested a welfare check after executing the search warrant, the fact that James Wells would not allow Mr. Knadle into the house, and the fact that Mr. Knadle has concerns regarding the welfare of the children as police found them on the day of the search.
(2) Plaintiff's hearsay and relevance objections to Mr. Knadle's proposed testimony regarding the children's school attendance record are sustained.
(3) Plaintiff's relevance objection regarding her comments about the source of the drug allegations against James Wells and herself are overruled.
For all of the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion in limine regarding the testimony of Dan Knadle is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.