From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trethaway v. Pizano

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2024
Civ. 3:23-CV-1523 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2024)

Opinion

Civ. 3:23-CV-1523

04-04-2024

SCOTT TRETHAWAY, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH PIZANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Daryl F. Bloom United States Magistrate Judge

AND NOW, this 4th day of April 2024, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. The motion is GRANTED as to the claim against the Borough of Exeter, and this claim will be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE;
2. The motion will be GRANTED as to Defendant Morgan, and the claim against him will be dismissed WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. The motion is DENIED as to the claim against Defendant Pizano.


Summaries of

Trethaway v. Pizano

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 4, 2024
Civ. 3:23-CV-1523 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Trethaway v. Pizano

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT TRETHAWAY, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH PIZANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 4, 2024

Citations

Civ. 3:23-CV-1523 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 4, 2024)