From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Treslley v. Billfinger Westcom Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 4, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-1074 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-cv-1074

05-04-2018

JOHN TRESLLEY, Plaintiff, v. BILLFINGER WESTCOM INC./BLUE SPRUCE, et al., Defendants.


CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Magistrate Judge Chelsey M. Vascura OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court for consideration of a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 5, 2018. (ECF No. 9.) The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against the John Doe defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to timely effect service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 5-4-2018
DATE

/s/ _________

EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Treslley v. Billfinger Westcom Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
May 4, 2018
Case No. 2:17-cv-1074 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Treslley v. Billfinger Westcom Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN TRESLLEY, Plaintiff, v. BILLFINGER WESTCOM INC./BLUE SPRUCE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 4, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:17-cv-1074 (S.D. Ohio May. 4, 2018)