From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TRES, Inc. v. Cheever Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1995
213 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the defendant has not shown a reasonable excuse for its default in opposing the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, nor a meritorious defense, the court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to vacate the prior order entered upon the defendant's default (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Andersen Co., 60 N.Y.2d 693; Stewart v. Warren, 134 A.D.2d 585). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

TRES, Inc. v. Cheever Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1995
213 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

TRES, Inc. v. Cheever Development Corp.

Case Details

Full title:TRES, INC., Respondent, v. CHEEVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 627 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 934