finding argument that Ward was not an "individual" within the terms of the Internal Revenue Code to be a "twisted conclusion by misinterpreting a portion of the Income Tax Code" and all other arguments "to be utterly without merit"
Summary of this case from United States v. CampbellNo. 87-1489.
April 25, 1988, October TERM, 1987.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 832 F. 2d 806.
finding argument that Ward was not an "individual" within the terms of the Internal Revenue Code to be a "twisted conclusion by misinterpreting a portion of the Income Tax Code" and all other arguments "to be utterly without merit"
Summary of this case from United States v. Campbellfinding contention that Ward was not an individual located within the jurisdiction of the United States to be utterly without merit
Summary of this case from Corley v. OatesFull title:TRENTON et al. v. SCOTT PAPER CO. et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 25, 1988
This per se rule, or presumption of vindictiveness, is a "prophylactic rule [which] prevents actual…
Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc." Subsequent Missouri cases reflect that the correct phrase, and the one adopted by Missouri, is in fact…