Trent Sowsonicut v. Roosevelt City

Full title: TRENT SOWSONICUT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROOSEVELT CITY, et al. Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Jul 12, 2004

Case No. 02:03-CV-676 (DB) (D. Utah Jul. 12, 2004)

Opinion

Case No. 02:03-CV-676 (DB).

July 12, 2004

W. ANDREW McCULLOUGH, McCullough Associates, LLC Midvale, UT.

BRETT C. PAINTER NATHALIE A. BLEUZE Davis Graham Stubbs LLP Denver, CO, Attorneys for Plaintiffs.

Peter Stirba STIRBA ASSOCIATES Salt Lake City, Utah, Attorneys for Defendants.

STIPULATED MOTION TO AMEND CLERICAL ERROR

BROOKE C. WELLS, Magistrate Judge (Part-time)

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to the following amendment to Plaintiffs' Complaint to correct a clerical error.

1. Paragraph 27 of Plaintiffs' Complaint alleges the following: "On or about August 3, 2003, Plaintiffs Wendellena Navanick, Daysha Sowsonicut, and Samantha Ankerpont, all minors, were attending the UBIC in Roosevelt, Utah."

2. The date in this paragraph is incorrect. The correct date is August 2, 2002. Thus, Paragraph 27 should be amended as follows: "On or about August 3, 2002, Plaintiffs Wendellena Navanick, Daysha Sowsonicut, and Samantha Ankerpont, all minors, were attending the UBIC in Roosevelt, Utah."

WHEREFORE, the parties hereby move the Court to enter an order amending the Complaint as set forth above.