From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trenary v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 9, 2023
No. 12698-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 9, 2023)

Opinion

12698-20S

01-09-2023

MATTHEW J. TRENARY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On November 10, 2021, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Although petitioner was directed to file an objection, if any, to the motion, no response was received.

The Tax Court is a court of limited jurisdiction, and we may exercise that jurisdiction only to the extent authorized by Congress. Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985). In addition, jurisdiction must be proven affirmatively, and a taxpayer invoking our jurisdiction bears the burden of proving that we have jurisdiction over the taxpayer's case. See Fehrs v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 346, 348 (1975); Wheeler's Peachtree Pharmacy, Inc. v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 177, 180 (1960). Thus, upon due consideration of the record of this case and for the reasons set forth in respondent's motion, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Trenary v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jan 9, 2023
No. 12698-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Trenary v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW J. TRENARY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jan 9, 2023

Citations

No. 12698-20S (U.S.T.C. Jan. 9, 2023)