From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trenary v. Busch Entertainment Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Aug 2, 2006
Case No. 8:05-CV-1630-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 8:05-CV-1630-T-30EAJ.

August 2, 2006


ORDER


Before the court is Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Order Granting Agreed Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 34), filed on July 12, 2006. Plaintiff has not filed a response as of the date of this order and the period for responding has elapsed. See Local Rule 3.01(b), M.D. Fla.

Also before the court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Expert Disclosures (Dkt. 35), which was filed on August 1, 2006 as an alternative to Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification. As the court addresses the previously-filed motion for reconsideration or clarification herein, Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Expert Disclosures is denied as moot.

On June 26, 2006, Plaintiff filed an Agreed Motion for Extension of Expert Disclosure Cut-Off. In the motion, Plaintiff represented that Defendant agreed to an extension of Plaintiff's deadline for expert disclosures through August 28, 2006, provided that Defendant's expert disclosure deadline was extended to August 3, 2006. (Dkt. 27 at 1). The undersigned granted the motion on July 3, 2006. (Dkt. 28).

In the instant motion, Defendant states that the terms presented to the court in the Agreed Motion were incorrect due to a miscommunication or misunderstanding between counsel. Defendant maintains that it agreed to Plaintiff's proposed extension of its expert disclosure deadline on the condition that Defendant receive the same number of days extension. (Dkt. 34 at 1). Defendant proposes that its expert disclosure date be extended through September 18, 2006 to preserve the interval of disclosures stated in the original Case Management Order. As noted above, Plaintiff has not objected to the relief sought.

Defendant argues in the alternative that if Defendant's expert disclosure deadline remains August 3, 2006, Plaintiff's disclosure deadline be rescheduled for July 13, 2006. Due to the timing of the motion and response period, this option is not a possibility.

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

(1) Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of Order Granting Agreed Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. 34) GRANTED IN PART as to Defendant's expert disclosure deadline, which is extended through September 18, 2006. The motion is DENIED IN PART as to all other relief requested. All other deadlines remain in effect.

(2) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Expert Disclosures (Dkt. 35) is DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Trenary v. Busch Entertainment Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Aug 2, 2006
Case No. 8:05-CV-1630-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Trenary v. Busch Entertainment Corporation

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW TRENARY, Plaintiff, v. BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, a foreign…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Aug 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 8:05-CV-1630-T-30EAJ (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2006)