From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trejo v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 4, 2015
No. 04-14-00731-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)

Opinion

No. 04-14-00731-CR

02-04-2015

Stephanie M. TREJO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2014CR0086W
Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed her first pro se motion to dismiss this appeal on October 28, 2014. However, the motion was not signed by her retained attorney, Jesse G. Rivera, as required by Rule 42.2(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). The clerk of this court attempted to contact appellant's counsel several times about the motion to dismiss but counsel did not respond. Therefore, the pro se motion to dismiss was denied on November 17, 2014 for failure to comply with Rule 42.2(a). Appellant has now filed another pro se motion to dismiss the appeal accompanied by a letter asking for the appointment of new counsel. The appellant's brief is currently due on February 11, 2015.

Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we ABATE this case to the trial court and ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to answer the following questions:

(1) Does appellant desire to prosecute her appeal?



(2) Is appellant indigent? If appellant is indigent, the trial court shall take such measures as may be necessary to assure the effective assistance of counsel, which may include the appointment of new counsel.



(3) Has appointed or retained counsel abandoned the appeal? Because sanctions may be necessary, the trial court should address this issue even if new counsel is retained or substituted before the date of the hearing.
The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the first two questions by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order the appellant's counsel to be present at the hearing.

The trial court is further ORDERED to file supplemental clerk's and reporter's records in this court, no later than thirty days after the date of this order, which shall include: (1) a transcription of the hearing and copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) written findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (3) recommendations addressing the above enumerated questions. All appellate filing dates are ABATED pending further orders from this court.

/s/_________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of February, 2015.

/s/_________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Trejo v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 4, 2015
No. 04-14-00731-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Trejo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Stephanie M. TREJO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Feb 4, 2015

Citations

No. 04-14-00731-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 4, 2015)