From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trejo v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2381 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2381 DAD P.

August 5, 2011


ORDER


Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case. Specifically, defendants request an additional ninety days to complete discovery and file dispositive motions. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 16) is granted;

2. The parties may conduct discovery until December 30, 2011. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date;

3. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before March 30, 2012. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this court's order filed October 6, 2010; and

4. Except as set forth in this order, the court's June 15, 2011 discovery and scheduling order remains in effect.

DATED: August 4, 2011.


Summaries of

Trejo v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 5, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2381 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Trejo v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:JORGE TREJO, Plaintiff, v. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2381 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)