From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Treglia v. California Department of Corr. Rehab

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0444 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0444 FCD EFB P.

February 27, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 3, 2007, plaintiff filed a complaint. On May 22, 2007, the court found that the complaint stated cognizable claims against defendants David R. Rios, J. Cantu, C. Gibson, M. Nielson, L. Wallace, and T. Miller. On June 29, 2007, the court directed plaintiff to submit six USM-285 forms and seven copies of the endorsed April 3, 2007, complaint for the United States Marshal to serve defendants. Plaintiff submitted USM-285 forms for defendants Rios, Cantu, Gibson and Wallace. He crossed out the names of defendants Nielson and Miller in the caption on the summons form. Thus, it is not clear whether plaintiff intends to proceed against defendants Nielson and Miller. In order to withdraw claims against these defendants, plaintiff must file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The court also notes that plaintiff submitted only two copies of the endorsed April 3, 2007, complaint. Plaintiff asserts that correctional officers have refused to make copies to enable plaintiff to comply with this court's June 29, 2007, order. He requests that the court make the required copies for him. However, plaintiff does not identify the officers who allegedly have denied his requests for copies. Neither has plaintiff submitted any evidence that he properly has requested that copies of the complaint be made for him. Thus, the court cannot make any findings or take any action with respect to plaintiff's allegations.

It therefore is ORDERED that within 30 days of the date this order is served:

1. Plaintiff shall either submit USM-285 forms for defendants Nielson and Miller or file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and,

2. Plaintiff shall either identify the individuals who refuse to make the requisite copies of the endorsed April 3, 2007, complaint and submit evidence that he properly has requested copies be made, or submit either three or five more copies of the complaint, depending on whether he elects voluntarily to dismiss defendants Nielson and Miller. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one copy of the April 3, 2007, pleading and two USM-285 forms.


Summaries of

Treglia v. California Department of Corr. Rehab

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0444 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Treglia v. California Department of Corr. Rehab

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL TREGLIA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0444 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)