From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trees v. Pfizer, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 3, 2019
933 N.W.2d 305 (Mich. 2019)

Opinion

SC: 159054 COA: 338297 SC: 159055 COA: 340191

10-03-2019

Pamela L. TREES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PFIZER, INC., Pfizer International, LLC, Greenstone, LLC, f/k/a Greenstone Limited, and Meijer, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Carol Bearup, Barbara Beecham, Sonya Mency, Viola Moses, and Heather Macks, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Pfizer, Inc., Pfizer International, LLC, Greenstone, LLC, f/k/a Greenstone Limited, Meijer, Inc., and CVS Caremark, Defendants-Appellees, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., d/b/a Sam’s Club, a/k/a Sam’s East, Inc., and Does 1-50, Defendants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Trees v. Pfizer, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Oct 3, 2019
933 N.W.2d 305 (Mich. 2019)
Case details for

Trees v. Pfizer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAMELA L. TREES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PFIZER, INC., PFIZER…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Oct 3, 2019

Citations

933 N.W.2d 305 (Mich. 2019)