Opinion
March, 1928.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur.
Present — Hubbs, P.J., Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.
March, 1928.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur.
Present — Hubbs, P.J., Sears, Crouch, Taylor and Sawyer, JJ.
Full title:JANE E. TREAT, Respondent, v. ROBERT R. TAYLOR, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Mar 1, 1928
The act ought not to be construed to include mining corporations unless it clearly appears that Congress…
Sterling Cider Co. v. HassettThe former is concededly a labeling act, and the statute which we have to construe is essentially a taxing…