From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Traviza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 26, 2023
No. 12783-21 (U.S.T.C. May. 26, 2023)

Opinion

12783-21

05-26-2023

ANTHONY W. SANTILIZ TRAVIZA & MARLI RODRIGUEZ RAMOS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER

Adam B. Landy Special Trial Judge

Rule 27(a), Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure, generally provides that in an electronic or paper filing with the Court, a party or nonparty making the filing should refrain from including or should take appropriate steps to redact certain specified information, including taxpayer identification numbers and financial account numbers. Due to the unredacted personal identifying information for petitioners appearing in the Commissioner's First Supplement to the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed May 24, 2023, the Court will take steps to seal the Commissioner's first supplement to protect petitioners' personal information.

The premises considered, it is

ORDERED that the Commissioner's First Supplement to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, filed May 24, 2023, at Doc. 11, is sealed and shall not be inspected by any person or entity not a party to this case, except by Order of the Court.


Summaries of

Traviza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
May 26, 2023
No. 12783-21 (U.S.T.C. May. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Traviza v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY W. SANTILIZ TRAVIZA & MARLI RODRIGUEZ RAMOS, Petitioners v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: May 26, 2023

Citations

No. 12783-21 (U.S.T.C. May. 26, 2023)