Opinion
Civil Case No. 04-cv-01926-LTB-PAC.
January 25, 2006
ORDER
This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, filed June 20, 2005 (Doc #36) be granted and that Plaintiff's complaint and all of his claims be dismissed. The Magistrate further recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, filed December 13, 2005 (Doc #58) be denied. The recommendation was filed January 16, 2006. Plaintiff has filed timely written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations. I have therefore reviewed the recommendations de novo in light of the file in this matter and Plaintiff's objections. On de novo review, I conclude that the recommendations are correct. Accordingly
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed December 13, 2005 (Doc #58) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed June 20, 2005 (Doc #36) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Complaint (including all of his claims) is DISMISSED.