From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Traver v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-12-TFM-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-12-TFM-C

04-08-2019

MICHAEL EDWARD TRAVER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER

On February 28, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation which recommends this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with the court's orders. See Doc. 11. No objections were filed.

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b) authorizes dismissal of a complaint for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order or the federal rules. Gratton v. Great Am. Commc'ns, 178 F.3d 1373, 1374 (11th Cir. 1999). Further, such a dismissal may be done on motion of the defendant or sua sponte as an inherent power of the court. Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir. 2005). "[D]ismissal upon disregard of an order, especially where the litigant has been forewarned, generally is not an abuse of discretion." Vil, 715 F. App'x at 915 (quoting Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989)). "[E]ven a non-lawyer should realize the peril to [his] case, when [he] . . . ignores numerous notices" and fails to comply with court orders. Anthony v. Marion Cty. Gen. Hosp., 617 F.2d 1164, 1169 (5th Cir. 1980); see also Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (As a general rule, where a litigant has been forewarned, dismissal for failure to obey a court order is not an abuse of discretion.). Therefore, the Court finds it appropriate to exercise its "inherent power" to "dismiss [Plaintiff's claims] sua sponte for lack of prosecution." Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L. Ed. 2d 734 (1962); see also Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V Monada, 432 F.3d 1333, 1337 (11th Cir. 2005) (describing the judicial power to dismiss sua sponte for failure to comply with court orders).

Plaintiff has taken no action since the filing of his complaint in January 2018. Despite several attempts to contact him requesting updated contact information, Plaintiff failed to respond. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to obey the Court's order.

DONE and ORDERED this the 8th day of April 2019.

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY F. MOORER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Traver v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 8, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-12-TFM-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Traver v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EDWARD TRAVER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-cv-12-TFM-C (S.D. Ala. Apr. 8, 2019)