From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travelers Indemnity Company v. Dana

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 12, 1983
434 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-2446.

July 12, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Michael H. Salmon, J.

Joseph A. McGowan, Miami, for appellant.

Preddy, Kutner Hardy and Howard K. Cherna, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Where, as here, the insured was injured after the past-due premium had been paid to the insurer, and there was evidence to support the trial court's finding that the insurer retained the past-due premium and was thus estopped to deny coverage, the judgment for the insured will be affirmed. See Mixson v. Allstate Insurance Company, 388 So.2d 608 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Cf. Travelers Indemnity Company of Rhode Island v. Mirlenbrink, 345 So.2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (no estoppel where accident for which coverage is sought occurs before payment of past-due premium).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Travelers Indemnity Company v. Dana

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 12, 1983
434 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Travelers Indemnity Company v. Dana

Case Details

Full title:THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ROSE DANA AND SHARON DANA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 12, 1983

Citations

434 So. 2d 48 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

WJA Realty Ltd. Partnership v. Employee Benefit Claims, Inc.

See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mirlenbrink, 345 So.2d 417 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). We reject WJA's argument that…

Nu-Air Mfg. Co. v. Frank B. Hall Co

An insurer cannot retain past-due premiums and at the same time claim that a forfeiture of the policy has…