From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Bird Acquisition, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CV 11-02077-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 11-02077-PHX-FJM

03-20-2012

Travelers Indemnity Co., Plaintiff, v. Bird Acquisition, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

We have before us plaintiff's motion for extension of time and request for expedited jurisdictional discovery (doc. 23). Defendant contends that because diversity is lacking, we do not have subject matter jurisdiction, and therefore this case should be dismissed. (Doc. 21). Plaintiff contends that defendant has not identified the sub-member of the LLC which allegedly destroys diversity.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED extending the date for Travelers Indemnity Company to respond to defendant's Request for Dismissal until fourteen (14) days following service of Bird Acquisition, LLC's response to Travelers Indemnity Company's First Set of Requests for Production. (Doc. 23).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bird Acquisition, LLC, shall respond to Travelers' First Set of Requests for Production on or before March 26, 2012.

Because subject matter jurisdiction is of critical importance to the court, the parties shall cooperate in supplying the identifying information.

____________________________

Frederick J. Martone

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Bird Acquisition, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 20, 2012
No. CV 11-02077-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Bird Acquisition, LLC

Case Details

Full title:Travelers Indemnity Co., Plaintiff, v. Bird Acquisition, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

No. CV 11-02077-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Mar. 20, 2012)