refitting of city's buildings contaminated by asbestos, to make them safe, was measure of plaintiffs' property damage
Summary of this case from Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims MgmtNo. 89-1576.
June 4, 1990, OCTOBER TERM, 1989.
C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 887 F. 2d 1200.
refitting of city's buildings contaminated by asbestos, to make them safe, was measure of plaintiffs' property damage
Summary of this case from Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Mgmtapplying New York law
Summary of this case from Providence Journal Co. v. Travelers Indemraising the reasons for the discharge goes to the issue of whether defendants have demonstrated a legitimate business reason for the discharge and whether plaintiff can demonstrate that the reason is pretextual, not to the initial question of whether plaintiff has made out a prima facie case
Summary of this case from Ligon v. Triangle Pacific Corp.Interpreting New York contract law, the Court concluded that a letter from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality constituted a suit, as it was a formal demand for immediate action to clean up a hazardous waste site.
Summary of this case from Joslyn Mfg. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.applying New York law
Summary of this case from Alabama Plating Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Full title:TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO. v. AVONDALE INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 4, 1990
At this court's request, Plaintiffs submitted a brief memorandum on the issue and Defendants jointly filed a…
City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co.Again the split among the courts is far more self-evident than a majority view. For example, the following is…