From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Travalini v. Atascadero State Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
1:11-cv-01694-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01694-SKO (HC)

10-19-2011

FRANK TRAVALINI, Petitioner, v. ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL


(DOCUMENT #1)

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Travalini v. Atascadero State Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
1:11-cv-01694-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Travalini v. Atascadero State Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK TRAVALINI, Petitioner, v. ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01694-SKO (HC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)