From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trappman v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 29, 2021
No. 1D19-1883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

1D19-1883

09-29-2021

David William Trappman, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

David William Trappman, pro se, Appellant. Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge.

David William Trappman, pro se, Appellant.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT TO THE SUPREME COURT

M.K. THOMAS, J.

Appellant filed a Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and for Certification of Conflict. We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We certify conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Olivard v. State, 831 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

Bilbrey and Tanenbaum JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trappman v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Sep 29, 2021
No. 1D19-1883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Trappman v. State

Case Details

Full title:David William Trappman, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

No. 1D19-1883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 29, 2021)