From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trapani v. Carney

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 13, 2011
Civ. No. 1:10-CV-1353 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1:10-CV-1353 (TJM/RFT).

January 13, 2011


DECISION ORDER


I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated December 13, 2010 have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

II. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. Furthermore, the action WILL BE DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DECISION AND ORDER UNLESS, BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF THAT TIME PERIOD, PLAINTIFF FILES AN AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THE REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint in the time period allowed, no further of the Court will issue and the action will be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: January 12, 2011


Summaries of

Trapani v. Carney

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 13, 2011
Civ. No. 1:10-CV-1353 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Trapani v. Carney

Case Details

Full title:DAMIAN TRAPANI, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT CARNEY, District Attorney; JANE DOE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 13, 2011

Citations

Civ. No. 1:10-CV-1353 (TJM/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2011)