From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trapani v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 2, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-2

In the Matter of Damian TRAPANI, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of Counsel), for Respondent.



Wyoming County–Attica Legal Aid Bureau, Warsaw (Adam W. Koch of Counsel), for Petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, and WHALEN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul two determinations of respondent rendered after tier II and tier III hearings. We confirm the determination rendered following the tier II hearing. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence ( see generally People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997), and “the record does not establish ‘that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from the alleged bias' ” (Matter of Colon v. Fischer, 83 A.D.3d 1500, 1501, 921 N.Y.S.2d 441).

As respondent correctly concedes, however, the determination rendered following the tier III hearing must be annulled. We therefore grant the petition in part by annulling that determination, and we direct respondent to expunge from petitioner's institutional record all references to the violation of the inmate rules therein and to vacate the recommended loss of good time. Petitioner requested the testimony of a nurse administrator and, although the Hearing Officer recorded her testimony, he did not have her testify in petitioner's presence. In the absence of any explanation as to why the testimony of that witness was taken outside of petitioner's presence ( cf. Matter of Janis v. Prack, 106 A.D.3d 1297, 1297, 964 N.Y.S.2d 775,lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 864, 2013 WL 4711156), we agree with petitioner that the Hearing Officer failed to comply with 7 NYCRR 254.5(b) ( see Matter of Jones v. Smith, 116 A.D.2d 993, 993, 498 N.Y.S.2d 712).

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination rendered February 13, 2013 is unanimously annulled on the law without costs, the petition is granted in part, respondent is directed to expunge from petitioner's institutional record all references to the violation of inmate rules 100.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][1] [iv] ), 104.11 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][5][ii] ), 104.13 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][5] [iv] ), and 106.10 (7 NYCRR 270.2[B][7][i] ) and the recommended loss of good time is vacated, and the determination rendered February 6, 2013 is confirmed.


Summaries of

Trapani v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
May 2, 2014
117 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Trapani v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Damian TRAPANI, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: May 2, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 1473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
117 A.D.3d 1473
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3102

Citing Cases

Pierre v. Annucci

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination,…

Kalwasinski v. Venettozzi

Here, although petitioner conceded at the hearing that one inmate who was in the special housing unit could…