From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Transportation Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 22, 1936
1 N.E.2d 613 (Ohio 1936)

Opinion

No. 25867

Decided April 22, 1936.

Public Utilities Commission — Motor transportation companies — Irregular intrastate certificate revoked — Property transported from unauthorized points — Operation conducted over regular routes and business solicited — Emergency equipment not reported or taxes paid — Intrastate and interstate freight commingled — Equipment substituted permanently without authorization.

ERROR to the Public Utilities Commission.

Mr. Edwin K. Levi, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, and Mr. Donald C. Power, for defendant in error.


This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Public. Utilities Commission of Ohio and was argued by counsel.

Plaintiff in error was the holder of an irregular intrastate certificate from and to Cincinnati, Ohio, and in addition thereto an interstate certificate over a regular route between Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus, Cleveland, Ohio, and Buffalo, New York.

The Public Utilities Commission, after citations and hearings, found plaintiff in error had violated laws of the state of Ohio and the rules and regulations of the Public Utilities Commission by transporting property in intrastate commerce from and to points other than Cincinnati; had operated over regular routes from Cincinnati, and through institution of pick-up and delivery service had solicited business for its irregular operation; had, while using emergency equipment within Ohio, failed, neglected and omitted to make accurate reports of such use and to pay the requisite taxes therefor; had intermingled both intrastate and interstate freight on one vehicle for transportation, thereby confusing the two operations; and had made permanent substitutions of motor transportation equipment without having made application therefor to the Public Utilities Commission. The commission revoked the intrastate certificate held by the plaintiff in error.

On consideration whereof, this court finding that the order of the Public Utilities Commission is not unlawful or unreasonable, it is ordered and adjudged that the order of the Public Utilities Commission be, and the same hereby is, affirmed. Scheible v. Hogan, 113 Ohio St. 83, 148 N.E. 581; Solt v. Public Utilities Commission, 114 Ohio St. 283, 150 N.E. 28; Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 117 Ohio St. 311, 158 N.E. 591; Midwestern Motor Transit, Inc., v. Public Utilities Commission, 126 Ohio St. 317, 185 N.E. 194; Mahoning Express Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 128 Ohio St. 369, 191 N.E. 368.

Order affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Transportation Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 22, 1936
1 N.E.2d 613 (Ohio 1936)
Case details for

Transportation Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm

Case Details

Full title:BLUE MOTOR TRANSPORTATION CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 22, 1936

Citations

1 N.E.2d 613 (Ohio 1936)
1 N.E.2d 613

Citing Cases

Lattavo Bros. v. P.U.C.

sion revoked and cancelled certificate No. 1564-I and ordered the payment of $42 to the treasurer of the…