From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Transportation Cas. Ins. v. Feldman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 2006
927 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 3D04-2914.

March 15, 2006. Rehearing Denied May 18, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Miami-Dade County, Ronald M. Friedman, J.

Wiederhold Moses, and Robert D. Moses, West Palm Beach; Pallo Marks Hernandez, and Bram Gechtman; Marjorie Gadarian Graham, Palm Beach Gardens, for appellant.

Richard Burke, and Mark J. Feldman, Miami, for appellees.

Before GERSTEN, GREEN and SUAREZ, JJ.


Appellant, Transportation Casualty Insurance Company ("Transportation"), appeals a final judgment awarding Mark Feldman ("Feldman"), $56,800.00 in attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse.

Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1991), authorizes an award of attorney's fees for insureds who successfully sue their insurers. See § 627.428, Fla. Stat. (1991). Section 627.428, however, does not authorize attorney's fees in worker's compensation cases because worker's compensation cases are governed by section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1991). See Aetna Ins. Co. v. Houck, 411 So.2d 936, 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); see also § 430.34, Fla. Stat. (1991).

Under section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1991), compensation claims judges, not circuit court judges, are authorized to award attorney's fees in worker's compensation cases. See § 440.34, Fla. Stat. (1991). However, when section 440.34(1) is read in connection with section 440.24(1), it allows circuit court judges to award attorney's fees in proceedings such as a rule nisi action to enforce payments of compensation. See McCormick v. Messink, 208 So.2d 113 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968).

Here, the trial court awarded Feldman $4,200.00 in attorney's fees incurred in the rule nisi proceeding. At oral argument, Transportation conceded that Feldman is entitled to $4,200.00 in attorney's fees. Therefore, we find that the trial court's award of $4,200.00 for attorney's fees incurred in the rule nisi proceeding is proper. However, we find that the trial court judge did not have statutory authority to award any other attorney's fees in this case.

Our reversal of the final judgment on attorney's fees and costs, however, does not preclude Feldman from pursuing a claim for tortious interference with a business relationship in the circuit court. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order, awarding Feldman attorney's fees and costs for $56,800.00, except the $4,200.00 that Transportation conceded.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Transportation Cas. Ins. v. Feldman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 18, 2006
927 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Transportation Cas. Ins. v. Feldman

Case Details

Full title:TRANSPORTATION CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mark J. FELDMAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 18, 2006

Citations

927 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Francisco v. Espinosa

We agree that the judge of compensation claims has exclusive jurisdiction to determine the fees to which the…