Opinion
No. CA 06-03579.
December 21, 2007.
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Eugene M. Fahey, J.), entered October 25, 2006. The judgment, among other things, adjudged that plaintiff has an easement by implication.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (GRETA K. KOLCON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
HAGERTY BRADY, BUFFALO (EDWIN P. HUNTER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Present: Martoche, J.P., Centra, Peradotto and Green, JJ.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.