Transcontinental Airport of Toledo v. Ogden

2 Citing cases

  1. Braman-Johnson Flying Service, v. Thomson

    167 Misc. 167 (N.Y. Misc. 1938)   Cited 4 times

    Research of the reported authorities and inquiries in connection therewith fail to reveal a similar factual situation. However, the general rules of bailment apply to aircraft just as they do to automobiles for hire. ( Whitehead v. Johnson, 150 Misc. 86; Transcontinental Airport of Toledo, Inc., v. Ogden, 41 Ohio App. 203; 180 N.E. 737; Ambassador Airways, Inc., v. Frank, 124 Cal.App. 56; 12 P. [2d] 127.) Furthermore, it seems that rules of law applicable to torts generally govern in this type of action.

  2. Whitehead v. Johnson

    150 Misc. 86 (N.Y. Mun. Ct. 1934)   Cited 1 times

    In such cases "the misuse or wrongful deviation of the hirer is treated as the occasion for the loss or damage" (Schouler Bailments, p. 59, ยง 139.) The general rules of bailment apply to aircraft (See Transcontinental Aircraft of Toledo v. Ogden, 41 Ohio App. 203; Ambassador Airways v. Frank, 124 Cal.App. 56; 12 P. [2d] 127), just as they do to motor cars and to horses. "The principle * * * does not change, but the things subject to the principle do change."