From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trandworld, Inc. v. Rubin

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 15, 2021
No. 3D20-1669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

3D20-1669

09-15-2021

Trandworld, Inc., Petitioner, v. Justin Rubin, et al., Respondents.

Tirado-Luciano &Tirado, and Monica Tirado and Alex Tirado-Luciano, for petitioner. Siegfried Rivera, and B. Michael Clark, Jr., for respondents.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County Lower Tribunal No. 18-9086 Martin Zilber, Judge.

Tirado-Luciano &Tirado, and Monica Tirado and Alex Tirado-Luciano, for petitioner. Siegfried Rivera, and B. Michael Clark, Jr., for respondents.

Before LINDSEY, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner's motion for rehearing is granted. We withdraw our previous opinion and issue this opinion in its place.

The petition for certiorari is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner seeking appellate review of the denial of its motion for relief and the order imposing sanctions once a final order has been entered. See, e.g., Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc., 720 So.2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) ("[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal.").

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Trandworld, Inc. v. Rubin

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Sep 15, 2021
No. 3D20-1669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Trandworld, Inc. v. Rubin

Case Details

Full title:Trandworld, Inc., Petitioner, v. Justin Rubin, et al., Respondents.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

No. 3D20-1669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Sep. 15, 2021)