From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Young

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:17-cv-01260-MCE-DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01260-MCE-DB P

06-09-2021

BINH C. TRAN, Plaintiff, v. K. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND JR. SENIOR UNITED STATES DTSTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights when they failed to protect him, violated his right to due process during a disciplinary hearing, and treated him differently than other inmates. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On February 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 68.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2021, are ADOPTED in full; and

2. Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 53) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tran v. Young

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 9, 2021
2:17-cv-01260-MCE-DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Tran v. Young

Case Details

Full title:BINH C. TRAN, Plaintiff, v. K. YOUNG, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-01260-MCE-DB P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2021)