From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Sapien

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:22-cv-02078-DJC-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02078-DJC-EFB (PS)

05-12-2023

CORRINA TRAN, Plaintiff, v. SAPIEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

HON. DANIEL J. CALABRETTA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 23, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ....”). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed March 23, 2023, are ADOPTED; and;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tran v. Sapien

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
May 12, 2023
2:22-cv-02078-DJC-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Tran v. Sapien

Case Details

Full title:CORRINA TRAN, Plaintiff, v. SAPIEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02078-DJC-EFB (PS) (E.D. Cal. May. 12, 2023)