From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Osler

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 13, 2023
3:22-cv-05968-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 13, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-05968-BHS

03-13-2023

TAM TRAN, Plaintiff, v. KELLI E. OSLER, Defendant.


ORDER

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Christel's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 4, recommending the Court deny pro se Plaintiff Tam Tran's application to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the action. Judge Christel correctly points out that Tran's complaint contains no factual allegations supporting a plausible claim against the sole defendant, Judge Osler, and that Tran's claims against her are facially frivolous because she has judicial immunity. Id. at 3-4.

Tran has not objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has long since passed.

The R&R is ADOPTED. Tran's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The Court will not permit Tran to amend his complaint because doing so would be futile. The case is DISMISSED.

The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT, send copies of this order to Tran and to Judge Christel, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tran v. Osler

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 13, 2023
3:22-cv-05968-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Tran v. Osler

Case Details

Full title:TAM TRAN, Plaintiff, v. KELLI E. OSLER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 13, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-05968-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 13, 2023)