From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Kuehl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 2, 2017
3:16-cv-00707-AC (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00707-AC

02-02-2017

LINH THI MINH TRAN, Plaintiff, v. DAKRYN J. KUEHL, BENJAMIN J. TOOPS and RYAN KERSEY, Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#45) on January 5, 2017, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendants' Motions (#12, #19) to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with leave to amend. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#45). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motions (#12, #19) to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by March 3, 2017. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Kuehl

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Feb 2, 2017
3:16-cv-00707-AC (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Linh Thi Minh Tran v. Kuehl

Case Details

Full title:LINH THI MINH TRAN, Plaintiff, v. DAKRYN J. KUEHL, BENJAMIN J. TOOPS and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Feb 2, 2017

Citations

3:16-cv-00707-AC (D. Or. Feb. 2, 2017)