From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Hagensen

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 31, 2023
3:23-cv-05150-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2023)

Opinion

3:23-cv-05150-BHS

03-31-2023

TAM TRAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN P. HAGENSEN, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David W. Christel's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 5, recommending that the Court deny pro se Plaintiff Tam Tran's application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the case with prejudice and without leave to amend as frivolous and without merit.

This case is one of more than 20 substantially similar cases Tran has filed in this District this year. It, like the others, contains no factual allegations and no legal theory of liability. Instead, this version asserts only that “Equal Justice Under Law No one above the law Judge John P. Hagen[sen] breaking title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because Washington Patrol arrest me no translator violate civil right.” Dkt. 1-1 at 5. Tran seeks $10 billion and asserts that he “need[s] Clark County Court Commissioner [to] resign, and investigation & prose[cute] criminal case.” Id.

The R&R thoroughly catalogues the deficiencies in this case, which are also present in Tran's other cases. Dkt. 5. It recommends dismissal with prejudice and without leave to amend, and the denial of in forma pauperis status in the event of any appeal.

Tran has not objected to the R&R, and it is ADOPTED.

Tran's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and he shall not have that status in the event of an appeal. The matter is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend.

Furthermore, Tran's practice of filing repetitive, facially frivolous complaints, seeking to proceed in forma pauperis, and refusing to amend his complaint is abusive and vexatious. If he continues to do so, he may be subject to a bar order, precluding him from filing additional cases in this District without prior court approval. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); see also, e.g., McGlown v. United States Dep't of Com., No. 23-cv-0049 TL, 2023 WL 1778934, at *3 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 6, 2023).

The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tran v. Hagensen

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 31, 2023
3:23-cv-05150-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Tran v. Hagensen

Case Details

Full title:TAM TRAN, Plaintiff, v. JOHN P. HAGENSEN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 31, 2023

Citations

3:23-cv-05150-BHS (W.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2023)