From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tran v. Clark Cnty. Court

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 30, 2023
C22-5925 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

C22-5925 BHS

01-30-2023

TAM TRAN, Petitioner, v. CLARK COUNTY COURT, Respondent.


ORDER

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Fricke's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), Dkt. 4, recommending that the Court deny pro se petitioner Tam Tran's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 1. Tran's proposed habeas petition, Dkt. 1-1, is duplicative of the claims he has sought to assert in Cause No. 22-cv-5924 BHS, and the Court has offered Tran an opportunity to assert all his habeas claims in that case. Tran has not objected to the R&R.

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;
(2) Tran's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 1, is DENIED;
(3) This matter is dismissed without prejudice.
(4) Tran is not entitled to in forma pauperis status for the purposes of any appeal.
(5) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Tran, enter a judgment, and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tran v. Clark Cnty. Court

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jan 30, 2023
C22-5925 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Tran v. Clark Cnty. Court

Case Details

Full title:TAM TRAN, Petitioner, v. CLARK COUNTY COURT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

C22-5925 BHS (W.D. Wash. Jan. 30, 2023)