Opinion
No. 05-12-00359-CR
11-01-2012
ANTHONY RAY TRAMMEL, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
AFFIRM;
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F11-56323-I
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Richter, and Lang
Opinion By Justice Richter
A jury convicted Anthony Ray Trammel of tampering with a government record and assessed punishment at fourteen years' imprisonment and a $5,000 fine. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court's duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court's judgment.
MARTIN RICHTER
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
120359F.U05
Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
ANTHONY RAY TRAMMEL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
No. 05-12-00359-CR
Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. F11- 56323-I).
Opinion delivered by Justice Richter, Justices Bridges and Lang participating.
Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered November 1, 2012.
MARTIN RICHTER
JUSTICE