From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 14, 1976
328 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

No. 75-1076.

March 26, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 14, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, John R. Beranek, J.

Thomas A. Hoadley of Howell, Kirby Montgomery, D'Aiuto Dean, and Edward W. Starr, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Marjorie D. Gadarian of Jones, Paine Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellees.


Appellant, Samuel J. Trammel, seeks review of a final judgment entered in favor of appellees, Larry Frady Crane Service and Reliance Insurance Company, in an action seeking damages for personal injuries sustained by the appellant as a result of alleged negligence in the operation of a crane.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties, we determine that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury that assumption of risk was a complete bar to recovery in a negligence action. The assumption of risk doctrine has been completely abrogated by the adoption of the comparative negligence principle. Rea v. Leadership Housing, Inc., 312 So.2d 818 (Fla.App. 1975). Accordingly, the judgment entered in favor of appellees, Larry Frady Crane Service and Reliance Insurance Company, is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 14, 1976
328 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Trammel v. Reliance Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL J. TRAMMEL, APPELLANT, v. RELIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY AND LARRY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 14, 1976

Citations

328 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)