From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trakis v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 23, 1982
439 N.E.2d 357 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided June 23, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ARTHUR W. LONSCHEIN, J.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Marjorie E. Bornes, of counsel), for appellant.

Peter E. De Blasio for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department. Though it was improper for Special Term to deny claimant James Trakis' application on the basis of his wife's ability to file a notice of claim on his behalf ( Matter of Rosenberg v City of New York, 309 N.Y. 304), it cannot be said that claimant's affidavit, portions of which were controverted by the city, required the granting of the application as a matter of law. For this reason, there must be a reversal of the Appellate Division order and a remittal to that court for its further consideration on the facts and in the exercise of discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Trakis v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 23, 1982
439 N.E.2d 357 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Trakis v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:JAMES TRAKIS, Respondent, et al., Claimant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 23, 1982

Citations

439 N.E.2d 357 (N.Y. 1982)
439 N.E.2d 357
453 N.Y.S.2d 641

Citing Cases

Trakis v. City of New York

In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim, claimant James Trakis appeals from so much of an…

Abbate v. City of N.Y.

Stated another way, there is no statutory restriction preventing Abbate's fiancé from filing a timely notice…