From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trainum v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 21, 1936
167 So. 801 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)

Opinion

1 Div. 213.

April 21, 1936.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; J. Blocker Thornton, Judge.

Malcomb Trainum was convicted of unlawfully possessing Marihuana cigarettes, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

Carl M. Booth, of Mobile, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The record proper in this case appears regular in all things.

In the transcript before us there appears a purported bill of exceptions. But it cannot be considered, for the reason that it has never been "authenticated by the signature of the judge presiding at the trial [or otherwise], as the statute requires." Sharpe v. Hughes et al., 202 Ala. 510, 80 So. 798; Code 1923, § 6432 et seq.; Hendrix v. State, 25 Ala. App. 296, 145 So. 501; Young v. State, 24 Ala. App. 240, 133 So. 750. The fact that the intended bill of exceptions bears the indorsement that it was presented to the trial judge cannot be considered an "authentication." Ib.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Trainum v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 21, 1936
167 So. 801 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
Case details for

Trainum v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRAINUM v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 21, 1936

Citations

167 So. 801 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
167 So. 801

Citing Cases

Tire Rubber Co. v. Cooper

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR. (Division B. May 4, 1936.) [ 167 So. 801. No. 32016.]…

Hatten v. Pearson

The volume incorrectly uses the word agreement. In the case of General Tire Rubber Company v. Cooper, 176…